Private Law – A a.y. 2025-2026 – Scienze dell'Educazione e della Formazione (EDU)

Teacher: Prof. Cristiano Iurilli

E-mail:

CFU: 6
Course code: 804001772
Bachelor Degrees: Scienze dell’educazione e della formazione
Language: Italian

Course delivery modalities: in-presence
Attendance: Optional
Assessment method: Oral examination

Pre-requisites:
Nessuno

Program:
General part LEGAL ORDER AND SOURCES OF LAW; SUBJECTIVE SITUATION AND LEGAL RELATIONSHIP; APPLICATION OF LAW IN SPACE AND TIME; INDIVIDUALS AND LEGAL PERSONS. Part one REAL RIGHTS; THE GOODS; THE PROPERTY’; POSSESSION. Second part THE MANDATORY RELATIONSHIP: ESSENTIAL CHARACTERS; FULFILLMENT OF OBLIGATIONS; EXTINCTION OF OBLIGATIONS. Third part THE CONTRACT; THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS; THE CONCLUSION OF THE AGREEMENT AND THE NEW CONTRACTUAL DYNAMICS; THE CONTRACT, CONSUMER PROTECTION AND INVIOLABLE HUMAN RIGHTS; INVALIDITY; NOTES ON EXTRA-CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY. Part four THE FAMILY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE LEGAL ORDER; MARRIAGE AND EQUITY RELATIONS; GENERAL PRINCIPLES REGARDING SUCCESSIONS.

Program:

General part
LEGAL ORDER AND SOURCES OF LAW;
SUBJECTIVE SITUATION AND LEGAL RELATIONSHIP;
APPLICATION OF LAW IN SPACE AND TIME;
INDIVIDUALS AND LEGAL PERSONS.
Part one
REAL RIGHTS;
THE GOODS;
THE PROPERTY’;
POSSESSION.
Second part
THE MANDATORY RELATIONSHIP: ESSENTIAL CHARACTERS;
FULFILLMENT OF OBLIGATIONS;
EXTINCTION OF OBLIGATIONS.
Third part
THE CONTRACT;
THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS;
THE CONCLUSION OF THE AGREEMENT AND THE NEW CONTRACTUAL DYNAMICS;
THE CONTRACT, CONSUMER PROTECTION AND INVIOLABLE HUMAN RIGHTS;
INVALIDITY;
NOTES ON EXTRA-CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY.
Part four
THE FAMILY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE LEGAL ORDER;
MARRIAGE AND EQUITY RELATIONS;
GENERAL PRINCIPLES REGARDING SUCCESSIONS.

Text books:
TESTO MERAMENTE CONSIGLIATO (CON LIBERTA’ PER LO STUDENTE DI UTILIZZARE TESTI DI RIFERIMENTO DIVERSI): GALGANO F., ISTITUZIONI DI DIRITTO PRIVATO, CEDAM, 2024

Educational goals and expected learning outcomes:
LEARNING OUTCOMES: Private law constitutes a basic teaching, aimed at providing the fundamental knowledge requirements of the entire sector. The topics covered by the course concern central themes of a transversal nature, the knowledge of which is required both in the context of public competitions and in almost all of the working sectors. KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING: About the course, the student must have acquired an overall and general knowledge of the institutions of private law, also grasping their innovative profiles in the light of the evolution of the economic and social system. APPLYING KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING: MAKING JUDGEMENTS: COMMUNICATION SKILLS: LEARNING SKILLS:

Educational goals and expected learning outcomes:

LEARNING OUTCOMES: Private law constitutes a basic teaching, aimed at providing the fundamental knowledge requirements of the entire sector. The topics covered by the course concern central themes of a transversal nature, the knowledge of which is required both in the context of public competitions and in almost all of the working sectors.
KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING: About the course, the student must have acquired an overall and general knowledge of the institutions of private law, also grasping their innovative profiles in the light of the evolution of the economic and social system.
APPLYING KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING:
MAKING JUDGEMENTS:
COMMUNICATION SKILLS:
LEARNING SKILLS:

Methods and criteria for verifying the learning:
The exam will take place in person and / or online, according to the instructions dictated by the University.The exam will take place in a single oral exam. The vote is expressed out of thirty at the end of the interview. The oral exam includes a minimum of 2 questions. During the test the student must demonstrate: Knowledge of the topics covered by the course. The ownership of the technical-legal language; The ability to critically analyze the topics covered. The exam will be evaluated according to the following criteria: – Failed: significant deficiencies and inaccuracies in the knowledge and the understanding of the subject matter; poor analytical and synthesizing skills, recurrent generalizations, limited critical and judgmental skills; the arguments are exposed inconsistently and with inappropriate language. – 18-20: Knowledge and understanding of topics barely adequate, with occasional generalizations and imperfections possible; sufficient capacity for analysis synthesis and autonomy of judgment, the arguments are frequently exposed in an incoherent manner and with inappropriate/non technical language. – 21-23: Fair knowledge and understanding of the subject; proper analysis and synthesis skills with coherent, logical argumentation, but with language that is often inappropriate/non technical. – 24-26: Moderate knowledge and understanding of the subjects; good analytical and synthesis skills with arguments expressed rigorously but with language that is not always appropriate/technical. – 27-29: Comprehensive knowledge and understanding of the subjects; remarkable analytical and synthesis skills. Good autonomy of judgment. Topics expounded rigorously and with appropriate/technical language. 30-30L: Excellent level of in-depth knowledge and understanding of the subjects. Excellent skills in analysis, synthesis, and independent judgment. Arguments are expressed in an original way and with appropriate technical language.

Methods and criteria for verifying the learning:

The exam will take place in person and / or online, according to the instructions dictated by the University.The exam will take place in a single oral exam.
The vote is expressed out of thirty at the end of the interview.
The oral exam includes a minimum of 2 questions.
During the test the student must demonstrate:
Knowledge of the topics covered by the course.
The ownership of the technical-legal language;
The ability to critically analyze the topics covered.
The exam will be evaluated according to the following criteria:
– Failed: significant deficiencies and inaccuracies in the knowledge and the understanding of the subject matter; poor analytical and synthesizing skills, recurrent generalizations, limited critical and judgmental skills; the arguments are exposed inconsistently and with inappropriate language.
– 18-20: Knowledge and understanding of topics barely adequate, with occasional generalizations and imperfections possible; sufficient capacity for analysis synthesis and autonomy of judgment, the arguments are frequently exposed in an incoherent manner and with inappropriate/non technical language.
– 21-23: Fair knowledge and understanding of the subject; proper analysis and synthesis skills with coherent, logical argumentation, but with language that is often inappropriate/non technical.
– 24-26: Moderate knowledge and understanding of the subjects; good analytical and synthesis skills with arguments expressed rigorously but with language that is not always appropriate/technical.
– 27-29: Comprehensive knowledge and understanding of the subjects; remarkable analytical and synthesis skills. Good autonomy of judgment. Topics expounded rigorously and with appropriate/technical language.
30-30L: Excellent level of in-depth knowledge and understanding of the subjects. Excellent skills in analysis, synthesis, and independent judgment. Arguments are expressed in an original way and with appropriate technical language.

Attendance modalities:
Attendance will be optional. In case of attendance at the lessons, particular consideration will be given to the exam.